From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Mar 31 11:20:44 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:20:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JgOce-0000mS-6T for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:20:44 -0700 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JgOcW-0000hB-HD for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:20:43 -0700 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so1638919fga.0 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:20:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ozTAXDUPyKfnXjDGrWobUz5dl0OLx1E+o3AWZLgqmso=; b=bhK8uXMjcPT5WCP8hUDBxKUl0hV/d/Vjh1KarDiITIs48NehgKtT/2fdZE/OM962fxztnsWrQYs2sD+sVwKMbaJRBnJoi54QYoJJBbLuPMu3GO+lW75rr9RHh5KuoRNeXanJi1O9jhkFBFhLrxEG1ldWUTp4DUvA9svft1DtB1c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BCRh0WxRg21AxFeV9/ITHR7WTlDy9GudHGKC3GA5LR5kUSaUUXVe18xSz+McJARAWe9ZWU7wfmOMqilDNd0GZzG3apwQGjUPPgXQF6spKM0JHds2GTY4rg8z2qYThlSsn7Ovb4Ms0/Nbz9Rwa+7or3V+hRIJvzkUZB9pMiyKrpA= Received: by 10.86.72.15 with SMTP id u15mr4694245fga.11.1206987631944; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.33.18 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560803311120m7b5175b7l6207e3cb495adca5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:20:31 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: zo bo In-Reply-To: <2f91285f0803310712u446302b6j9a3b70fe3f68091c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2f91285f0803310712u446302b6j9a3b70fe3f68091c@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 405 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 3/31/08, Vid Sintef wrote: > .i mi do pu nelci gi'e cabo prami > > .i mi do ge pu nelci gi cabo prami > > Is my use of {bo} here correct? The first one is correct, the second one is not. The forethought equivalent of the first one is: .i mi do ca ke ge pu nelci gi prami > Do I still need it if {ca} follows gihek/gik? > (le nu nelci and le nu prami are meant to be sequential.) {ca} indicates simultaneity, not sequentiality. Did you mean {gi'e ba bo}? mu'o mi'e xorxes