From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Apr 02 08:59:56 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jh5NT-0005CR-02 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:59:56 -0700 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.226]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Jh5NB-00057k-Lw for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:59:48 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c48so1861632wra.1 for ; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:59:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=NUrJFDJy0VvQ1qg9w1omcRS315xDJo7UORnEUNSifNs=; b=fZopv2ssoAv3WKTXG+KOdZi6IORUaamjAlil4DZEjCnJeuzc7C16WZYbkaNG6gQKiUzNJIJPOFQXirSLeUvTMbHBbK4/DxrGSejm2fd99kl0M+XZy0AaNeKRmfrnvtmDikKSp/eWKYoj0I7dj+WqobfqAYdg7nweUxh/CItb2eM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=N3vTaic5RufQbp3NIpuIBp61dP2ZMlnfPsG4Fg2WeW3pfJqEZ0ZzGh7F7BBNnI49wn6n7PYPaG/Cajt3cox8IVBGbO/vPXU7hs7vH9ldtsWPc3ioZhots5tx0JuI9RauP2ptPA0k8KngwIxDKC12zke475jlokD3/FEallq++6I= Received: by 10.141.154.5 with SMTP id g5mr5036026rvo.290.1207151970348; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.136.10 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Apr 2008 08:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <702226df0804020859o528fb2bcn5abbab9bda642796@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:59:30 -0500 From: "Jon \"Top Hat\" Jones" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: "lai" in name In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1220_717479.1207151970347" References: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 442 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: eyeonus@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------=_Part_1220_717479.1207151970347 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 4/1/08, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > > In a message dated 4/1/2008 05:01:28 AM Central Daylight Time, > ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > > > "re ninmu cu kelci" -> "la elaizas joi la meris kelci la cytlkak" (or > "lo selkelrcytlkaki" or maybe even "lo terda'i selkei") > > > > I see "lai" in the name "elaizas". This is controversial at best. This is why I support the "Dot Side" proposal. {la .elaizas.} would be fine. stevo > > -- mu'o mi'e .topy'at. .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu ------=_Part_1220_717479.1207151970347 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On 4/1/08, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com <MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com> wrote:
In a message dated 4/1/2008 05:01:28 AM Central Daylight Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


"re ninmu cu kelci" -> "la elaizas joi la meris kelci la cytlkak" (or
"lo selkelrcytlkaki" or maybe even "lo terda'i selkei")


I see "lai" in the name "elaizas".  This is controversial at best.
 
This is why I support the "Dot Side" proposal. {la .elaizas.} would be fine.

stevo




--
mu'o mi'e .topy'at.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu ------=_Part_1220_717479.1207151970347--