From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Apr 04 11:44:10 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JhqtW-0006VD-1m for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:44:10 -0700 Received: from imo-m25.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.6]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JhqtR-0006Um-U5 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:44:09 -0700 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id d.d3c.224a0763 (41810) for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:43:43 -0400 (EDT) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:43:43 EDT Subject: [lojban-beginners] rafsi instead of gismu in songs To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_d3c.224a0763.3527d0df_boundary" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.7 X-Spam-Score-Int: 7 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 460 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners --part1_d3c.224a0763.3527d0df_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 4/4/2008 04:22:26 AM Central Daylight Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > From: "LakMeer Kravid" > Subject: [lojban-beginners] A few small questions > > coi rodo > I have a few questions: > ..3) How badly would it screw with my grammar if I were to use a > one-syllable rafsi in the place of a gismu, for rhythmic purposes in > songwriting? It probably ceases to be parsable, but is it forgivable > under the banner of 'artistic license'? > It would totally confuse me. And it would definitely (not just probably) be unparseable, at least with the intended meaning. stevo --part1_d3c.224a0763.3527d0df_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 4/4/2008 04:22:26 AM Cent= ral Daylight Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


From: "LakMeer Kravid" <= lakmeerkravid@gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] A few small questions

coi rodo
I have a few questions:
..3) How badly would it screw with my grammar if I were to use a
one-syllable rafsi in the place of a gismu, for rhythmic purposes in
songwriting? It probably ceases to be parsable, but is it forgivable
under the banner of 'artistic license'?


It would totally confuse me.  And it would definitely (not just pro= bably) be unparseable, at least with the intended meaning.  

stevo --part1_d3c.224a0763.3527d0df_boundary--