From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri May 30 08:25:57 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 30 May 2008 08:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K26UP-0005P0-SP for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 08:25:57 -0700 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K26UJ-0005Ob-S6 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 08:25:57 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o29so356562ugd.28 for ; Fri, 30 May 2008 08:25:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=bc8PT+L5NU8SNTC0TNXBJ89FutidIOzLeM0zxUBsObs=; b=BwFVknck8j8sPS2qqgvJF4fvQky08Pf7Qv4jerTgKoR3dgmpHmXbjlafW4MSwGvlDpXqiRdFzEkRVa1Nf9WifZNqnv3mOeawTf7+crp1FdqPYWbpsIN7CYbWx15AZZUwEqTKZhrKLJdJrA+oq0owXClDxFhs+fwmmXLxIADRhX0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=exP8Zs/aLQAg0nkIAvzRbn7rDU1YkDyvM7siYygP+Yj80Eo48cVGOBWAVLUeTLNu3Q5EVWIPtZvrWXMvkW2PpT/eTy7pHdCyTvdoYzfKoGQ4IqIg7r6/aHhiihQGzdyIVrjRROdDpUFIgulTS10MTVpcfMqF0z9n7z+MJuEwLCk= Received: by 10.86.26.1 with SMTP id 1mr439597fgz.49.1212161146911; Fri, 30 May 2008 08:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.33.18 with HTTP; Fri, 30 May 2008 08:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560805300825q172c4536l7c91041055dedc8e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 12:25:46 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: the gismu typos In-Reply-To: <2f91285f0805300810i2f7fb929oe927c5434d9b7f93@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <2f91285f0805300810i2f7fb929oe927c5434d9b7f93@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 616 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 5/30/08, Vid Sintef wrote: > żIs it really too late to fix these gismu: Yes. > cusku (--> cuska) {cusku} is one of the most used gismu, perhaps even the most used one. I'd say it would be impossible to change it at this stage. > cadzu (--> cazdu) > > jorne (--> jirne) {jirne} would conflict with {jirna}. > spofu (--> spotu) > > and so on. I don't think there is any chance of changing the form of any gismu by decree. Eventually some not very used one might change through usage, but none of these would seem to be in that category. mu'o mi'e xorxes