From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri May 30 23:32:35 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 30 May 2008 23:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K2Kdn-0006GU-5v for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 23:32:35 -0700 Received: from smtp.mail.umich.edu ([141.211.93.161] helo=tombraider.mr.itd.umich.edu) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K2Kdh-0006GA-Ff for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 23:32:35 -0700 Received: FROM [192.168.1.6] (c-67-174-205-222.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.174.205.222]) BY tombraider.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 4840F0BC.D28AE.32217 ; 31 May 2008 02:31:25 -0400 Message-Id: From: Alex Martini To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Fwd: the gismu typos Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 23:31:22 -0700 References: <2f91285f0805300810i2f7fb929oe927c5434d9b7f93@mail.gmail.com> <12d58c160805300852m2f922402n556158970101b80e@mail.gmail.com> <12d58c160805300858r60f0659ase172a2f1106e0916@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 620 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: alexjm@umich.edu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On May 30, 2008, at 11:25 PM, LakMeer Kravid wrote: > I don't understand, why would you want to change these? are they > wrong? i'm confused. If I remember right, there were some typos/errors made when the gismu were being created. So, for example I think {gismu} was meant to be {gicmu}. The change would be an attempt to "go back" to what the gismu-making algorithm originally made.