From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jul 03 14:10:59 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KEW4x-0001ZQ-Q6 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:10:59 -0700 Received: from narnia.blumen-schwarz.de ([80.190.195.21]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KEW4s-0001YZ-Ju for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:10:59 -0700 Received: from n5813.n.pppool.de ([89.50.88.19]) by narnia.blumen-schwarz.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KEW4h-0001IU-IM for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:10:47 +0200 From: namor To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Implications of partly negated, commutative logical connections User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <200807030148.13022.eldrikdo@gmail.com> <200807031555.37662.eldrikdo@gmail.com> <925d17560807030754v30c4f62ao167c751f5f5b5ae9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <925d17560807030754v30c4f62ao167c751f5f5b5ae9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:15:20 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807032315.22647.eldrikdo@gmail.com> X-Spam_score: -4.7 X-Spam_score_int: -46 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: ------------- Start der SpamAssassin Auswertung --------------- Bei Fragen dazu bitte das Forum life.d.cvmx verwenden! Details der Inhaltsanalyse: (-4.7 Punkte, 5.0 benoetigt) -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Nachricht wurde nur über vertrauenswürdige Rechner weitergeleitet -4.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Spamwahrscheinlichkeit nach Bayes-Test: 0-1% [score: 0.0000] 1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list ---------------- Ende der SpamAssassin Auswertung ----------------- X-Spam-Score: 1.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: 12 X-Spam-Bar: + X-archive-position: 673 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: eldrikdo@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners > Strictly speaking, it's not even clear that you are talking about more than > one occasion or that you are pairing the different eventual eatings or not > eatings with simultaneous being happies or not being happies. > > You could make that more explicit by saying: > > {za'a roroiku le prenu cu gelki gi'anai citka} > "I observe that, on each occasion, it is true that the person is happy > if it is true that the person eats" Would {za'a roroiku le prenu cu gelki ijanai ri citka} mean the same? What exactly does {roroiku} bind to, how does it work with multiple bridi? (priority question) > {so'aroiku}, {so'eroiku}, {so'iroiku}, ... uisai. ti poi cmavo cu mutce plixau vau pe'i .i ki'e -- mu'o mi'e la namor e la'oi Rumpelstilzchen .i mi to'e djica lonu mi miptera