From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jul 03 18:18:57 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KEZwv-0004jJ-G3 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:18:57 -0700 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KEZwr-0004j9-By for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:18:57 -0700 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so389513fga.0 for ; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:18:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=LOLPcEaP0gdLVJBLuL4UMto6sqgvSmtvLCYx3b4omEU=; b=mJu+zn1dRJSVAT6ti0g3elPuYqpnZJ0TunuW1Oqrj1Vrrz701JIAqN2N2nzawb5Cjy rz7nIS0psTxcKn7kjRIcHrH9m0eYPTQe7gvJmnsW8clsOLB2P/JuF2u9NtBTJX75zEsE mwzn/t7BQ4q0UjK2QmKC95kEMx/dvX6asLRfc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=om9kjxjsHcEZpyNih/43RFkKaTZjh4TIgL0tjL4FvgdzboHbV8kjhAT+6TGNhVf6JH lxuYkl9ZSRp5MGspqn1P4/hg40fhZ9M5DuxEBTktc5nJ7TQBJOoPINWTncz96owCoua/ UY+hDSG2qt0Crp48RE2EL4NiboQw+487Tx/ws= Received: by 10.86.33.19 with SMTP id g19mr317475fgg.30.1215134331811; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.28.10 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 18:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560807031818l37756667i85a0317297682c68@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 22:18:51 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Implications of partly negated, commutative logical connections In-Reply-To: <200807032315.22647.eldrikdo@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200807030148.13022.eldrikdo@gmail.com> <200807031555.37662.eldrikdo@gmail.com> <925d17560807030754v30c4f62ao167c751f5f5b5ae9@mail.gmail.com> <200807032315.22647.eldrikdo@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 674 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 6:15 PM, namor wrote: >> >> {za'a roroiku le prenu cu gelki gi'anai citka} >> "I observe that, on each occasion, it is true that the person is happy >> if it is true that the person eats" > > Would {za'a roroiku le prenu cu gelki ijanai ri citka} mean the same? > What exactly does {roroiku} bind to, how does it work with multiple bridi? > (priority question) {roroiku} is a term, it will only belong to the first bridi in that case, so it won't be equivalent. But these would be: {za'a roroiku ga le prenu cu gleki ginai ri citka} {za'a roroiku zo'u le prenu cu gelki .ijanai ri citka} mu'o mi'e xorxes