From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jul 31 10:50:33 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KOcIL-00079R-Dm for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:50:33 -0700 Received: from web25007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.110]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KOcIF-00078v-6r for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:50:33 -0700 Received: (qmail 84958 invoked by uid 60001); 31 Jul 2008 17:50:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=tHU1upDGr4G/BKwBQfqoDDST+tSbvxIub9vs6uq9BHOylLyYG0/3k/KEG1hiT/CkIhfsQ98VRPlirX8JcF5e/s6IL7f7tSEIgr8hFQ4PFKVaEmgItDilJSC9xKOgqk19r/sMFwjc4Q/DZW5qKvty2qUpWD2C1T7z0TnLN5p8z6k=; X-YMail-OSG: m8IcrhMVM1kaXcwcAMiyNNUPySw8vUpayKtdWWpKMIa8JQQe7ggfXIHUHqq_BYamBtBgCHNGTl65ImSNSGviRahobYkTqqeXXUAE2pZ0FED3Q.Yj9ICDPBYlxeAzaUaKW8nbvm0sBiel2nFk7bhKSG8- Received: from [78.150.170.11] by web25007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:50:20 BST Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:50:20 +0100 (BST) From: Fiat Knox Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Hello, and owning things.. To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <925d17560807311039j19998261pc4a1b0ace746ada8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <192127.75918.qm@web25007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.1 X-Spam-Score-Int: 11 X-Spam-Bar: + X-archive-position: 744 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fiat_knox@yahoo.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners What algorithm does the jbovlaste search engine use? --- Jorge Llambías wrote: > On 7/31/08, Mark wrote: > > I guess what confused me on this was the use of "lo mi > karce cu va > > zvati" for "my car is there", in Everyday Lojban Lesson > 1. I can't > > see why this is "lo" and not "le" - surely the thing > that's over there > > is a particular car of his that he's thinking of. > It could be "le" as well. "lo" is just more general, it > covers both > the generic and the particular cases, it just doesn't > emphasize > that it's about a partcular one. That use of "lo" there > is perfectly > fine. In fact, one could use "lo" always and forget about > every > other gadri (except "la"). > > > Also, is there some kind of problem with jbovlaste? > > Its searches are quite horrible, yes. > > >search for "success" and it'll find nothing at all, > > even though snada is in the fortunecity dictionary; > > But you have to search for "succeed", of course! :) > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > > Peace, Alex. "Oh, I love it when they /ask/ me to corrupt them ..." - Me, talking to Nai, Mar 01 2008 "You people and your quaint little categories." - Captain Jack Harkness, Torchwood "We're grown ups now, and it's our turn to decide what that means." - Randall Munroe, http://xkcd.com Conquer the Universe with me! See how at http://fiat-knox.livejournal.com We are now leaving the Kingdom of Star Trek and entering normal space. __________________________________________________________ Not happy with your email address?. Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html