From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Sep 03 09:57:49 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kavfw-0001O6-OD for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:57:48 -0700 Received: from mx.freeshell.org ([192.94.73.19] helo=sdf.lonestar.org ident=root) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kavft-0001Np-F3 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:57:48 -0700 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:jwodder@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m83CT6Ru017285 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 12:29:06 GMT Received: (from jwodder@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.2/8.12.8/Submit) id m83CT589005345 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 12:29:05 GMT Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 12:29:05 +0000 From: Minimiscience To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: coi ro do Message-ID: <20080903122903.GA24808@sdf.lonestar.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: SDF Public Access UNIX System User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 855 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: minimiscience@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners dei li 03 pi'e 09 pi'e 2008 la'o fy. purpleposeidon .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. > I've written a few things while I was away from the great Net. .skamyxatra Although I don't see any real problems with the grammar itself, most Lojbanists use "{cu}" rather than "{ku}" to separate {sumti} from {selbri}. la'o fy. purpleposeidon .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. > But anyways, the real question is... what does "by standard x" mean? .skamyxatra It depends a bit on exactly what {gismu} you're referring to, but it is generally used to specify the standard or set of qualifications under which an otherwise subjective statement can be said to be true. mu'omi'e la'o gy. Minimiscience .gy. -- mi pu klama .i mi pu viska .i mi pu fanva fi la lojban.