From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Nov 13 12:14:46 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:14:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L0iaU-0006bc-Ag for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:14:46 -0800 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L0iaR-0006bG-B7 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:14:46 -0800 Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p5B201A07.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.32.26.7]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKwh2-1L0iaK1rP3-0004Zh; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:14:36 +0100 Message-ID: <491C8AB7.7040901@online.de> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:14:47 +0100 From: Klaus Schmirler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080702 SeaMonkey/1.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: A priest, a rabbi and an Indian chief walk into a bar... References: <71550650811111530v3febc4a1t30b7f69427cdbde1@mail.gmail.com> <96f789a60811120838l1e9df762n805d661bd819a04d@mail.gmail.com> <702226df0811121336m52a52dd1gf8d08e9e2715ba2c@mail.gmail.com> <200811122251.58790.phma@phma.optus.nu> In-Reply-To: <200811122251.58790.phma@phma.optus.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18GpVGUF2eaPkk2E3phllPABx1CHNVYS0hqjuB q2/uJOUBSBMmoeynd9ek11d/UDqzCn4S8wNL82Y7e+tbT/wUeJ kU2K9zQErWgWFuHq0uALQ== X-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-Spam-Score-Int: 1 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 1032 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: KSchmir@online.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Pierre Abbat schrieb: > On Wednesday 12 November 2008 16:36:46 Jon "Top Hat" Jones wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Michael Turniansky >> >> wrote: >>> Personally, I would have used broctu or brogi'a (which would be >>> distinct from the cohen, brori'ija'a, or soemthing along those lines), >>> but that's just the opinion of this Orthodox Jew. Although you do >>> have a point about the universality of the borrowing. If you do want >>> to go with the fu'ivla, Pierre's ravboni is good (since it does >>> hearken back to the Aramaic rabban). >>> >>> --gejyspa >> Do we not have words to make a lujvo meaning Jewish-priest? > > A cohen is a priest. A rabbi may or may not be a priest, and may or may not be > a preacher (some rabbis are food inspectors and certify food as kosher). And > we don't have a gismu or lujvo in jbovlaste for "priest". > > phma > > > Luther's translation into German was "Schriftgelehrter", somebody learned, or rather "taught" in the Scriptures. If that helps ... klaus