From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Dec 25 21:36:56 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:36:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LG5NX-0001fD-Sb for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:36:56 -0800 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.246]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LG5NV-0001ek-BB for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:36:55 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so3913869rvf.46 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:36:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=nI+P37KVtFG2ZV+G1DWimgapv2vjNDqB9z6SUc6hn78=; b=kQqjjUv2TT/HFFZSUWs8xBi7c/1dz70cRZ31UbX95ZCVwSe4pM/dAV8T6XdA9qKvCj I9hDYmnlsjrjaO92Fc6Affs5SK8Ub/hHAwFQTJQl6rp1mmHygidc3iRD40YF5NJ5/8+q stqgjIM/f4MJAJZfgFWEB08i2P3b6AXxhGSY0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=DggEuFX9oCviey8xNJVWaCEWc65ZM9Val9VgwGKaaEqCG+GlLZQ3S+E6opVkGd8ucG 6jTt5KgLCveCqarYLEaoiZwytRqTLScMQqMRAjH5i6pvWU/MxBXKtY40a9L5hTQoOclD wnj96mx7/jI4OnNjfANlo+MQveODS+dwnRMjQ= Received: by 10.141.180.5 with SMTP id h5mr5120114rvp.82.1230269812321; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:36:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.125.18 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:36:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:36:52 +1300 From: "LakMeer Kravid" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Complex Selbri In-Reply-To: <20081226012726.GC7051@sdf.lonestar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_81574_29573935.1230269812310" References: <49542F12.4040908@synx.us.to> <20081226012726.GC7051@sdf.lonestar.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 1111 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lakmeerkravid@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------=_Part_81574_29573935.1230269812310 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I love {be}, it's incredibly useful. I also prefer it aesthetically; I often prefer {le pendo be mi} to say, {le mi pendo}, which incidentally is also less specific. I have a quick question about {be} however: If I wish to make the sumti "one who converses in lojban" using {be}, do I say {lo tavla be fo lo jbobau} or {lo tavla fo be lo jbobau} ? ki'e Lak ------=_Part_81574_29573935.1230269812310 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I love {be}, it's incredibly useful. I also prefer it aesthetically; I often prefer {le pendo be mi} to say, {le mi pendo}, which incidentally is also less specific.
I have a quick question about {be} however:
If I wish to make the sumti "one who converses in lojban" using {be}, do I say {lo tavla be fo lo jbobau} or {lo tavla fo be lo jbobau} ?
ki'e
Lak
------=_Part_81574_29573935.1230269812310--