From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jan 13 09:33:39 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:33:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LMn91-0004G4-Hy for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:33:39 -0800 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.247]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LMn8v-0004Fc-CR for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:33:39 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so105159rvf.46 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:33:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Voqjx76rlKj9a0htD8VbMNFPkwQwECsgIrln+4e3ht8=; b=PgBadnn/TQv7KMagriEXd0Ltc5ix+llgqcq8pEI6nZxyClfPou4uvYx0rYm9EdAc6J NG0P090aNzseCRd3JpDPBfVn9xgW6L5eWCQtXDu97rvIu36dMNlR00d/Oyg8+lxHiBwf Dm7Ix5vdDMNJPYFhF/Rko+rk9ihFxs08kbJMA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=Tak3EszMhLzD1ADZOqr0SPKbafUO8eEHOKZ9ywW/MxtxaId7uTUmQSkhmvUGOB1nAr e+D/c6+neZHUEuqivY7AHHQt7mZWaL2PA2HFG7PDc5GTh5T0sMFmfk6Hmycn+FnSGeWB p9TP3n0VKCX5dCEl9eAnRhxO9fmz0b12CvU0k= Received: by 10.141.196.19 with SMTP id y19mr15389893rvp.173.1231868012602; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:33:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.194.15 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:33:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560901130933v29142ccfqa47f4f93d7559e30@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:33:32 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: xelfanva In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20090113001704.GA13721@sdf.lonestar.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 1177 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Brett Williams wrote: > > you might or might not want to use the popular new term for nameless: > "caucme".. Is it really popular, or is it only a word used by the jbotcan software? (BTW, is jbotcan down or is it just me that can't access it?) It seems that "cmecau" makes more sense for "nameless" (= claxu be lo cmene). "caucme" seems to be some kind of name (i.e. a word), not someone or something without a name. mu'o mi'e xorxes