From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jan 20 06:08:42 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:08:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LPHHW-0006I6-Bk for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:08:42 -0800 Received: from mx.freeshell.org ([192.94.73.19] helo=sdf.lonestar.org ident=root) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LPHHT-0006Hm-8z for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:08:42 -0800 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:jwodder@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0KE8acY007075 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:08:36 GMT Received: (from jwodder@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.2/8.12.8/Submit) id n0KE8a2s029327 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:08:36 GMT Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:08:35 +0000 From: Minimiscience To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: "cu" with PU Message-ID: <20090120140833.GA18337@sdf.lonestar.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: SDF Public Access UNIX System User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 1238 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: minimiscience@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners de'i li 20 pi'e 01 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. > Is "cu" required with PU? I thought that "cu" with PU was redundant at best. .skamyxatra If you mean "{cu}" before a PU at the beginning of a main {selbri}, the Yacc grammar does seem to indicate that the "{cu}" would be unnecessary there. mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun. -- na'e du'u mi lazni .i du'u mi na'e selra'u sa'u