From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Apr 10 11:36:25 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LsLaT-0002QO-Ja for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:36:25 -0700 Received: from mx.freeshell.org ([192.94.73.19] helo=sdf.lonestar.org ident=root) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LsLaP-0002QG-Va for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:36:25 -0700 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:jwodder@iceland.freeshell.org [192.94.73.5]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3AIZxUN029365 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:35:59 GMT Received: (from jwodder@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.3/8.12.8/Submit) id n3AIZxZk016117 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:35:59 GMT Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:35:59 +0000 From: Minimiscience To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: lujvo into fu'ivla Message-ID: <20090410183558.GA2725@sdf.lonestar.org> References: <4de8c3930904101055m53888421l643e2e9e268898b3@mail.gmail.com> <20090410180615.GA13333@sdf.lonestar.org> <4de8c3930904101132j4ec7cfaagcd886a04ed73d4f0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4de8c3930904101132j4ec7cfaagcd886a04ed73d4f0@mail.gmail.com> Organization: SDF Public Access UNIX System User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: de'i li 10 pi'e 04 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. tijlan .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. > On the "Exhaustive list of short fu'ivla forms" page, it says "in all > cases where CC is allowed non-initially, C/C is also allowed", and it > lists this example: > > CCCCCVV (stsmla'u) > > So I thought "CC/C/C/CVV" was possible. .skamyxatra [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-archive-position: 1492 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: minimiscience@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners de'i li 10 pi'e 04 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. tijlan .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. > On the "Exhaustive list of short fu'ivla forms" page, it says "in all > cases where CC is allowed non-initially, C/C is also allowed", and it > lists this example: > > CCCCCVV (stsmla'u) > > So I thought "CC/C/C/CVV" was possible. .skamyxatra All of those Cs are part of an initial consonant cluster, and so are not occurring "non-initially." mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun. -- na'e du'u mi lazni .i du'u mi na'e selra'u sa'u