From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Apr 10 15:32:46 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LsPHC-0007LH-Ke for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:32:46 -0700 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.122]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LsPHA-0007L3-7u for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:32:46 -0700 Received: from chausie ([71.75.215.96]) by cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090410223238.QTPE2520.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com@chausie> for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:32:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56B01607 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:32:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: lujvo into fu'ivla Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:32:35 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <4de8c3930904101055m53888421l643e2e9e268898b3@mail.gmail.com> <200904101740.01504.phma@phma.optus.nu> <20090410215004.GA12830@sdf.lonestar.org> In-Reply-To: <20090410215004.GA12830@sdf.lonestar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904101832.36425.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Friday 10 April 2009 17:50:05 Minimiscience wrote: > de'i li 10 pi'e 04 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Pierre Abbat .fy. cusku zoi > skamyxatra. > > > I suggest "atrilma'e" instead. "trilma'e" is a slinku'i, so "atrilma'e" > > is valid. > > .skamyxatra > > Actually, I'm pretty sure that's not valid. "tr" is a valid initial > consonant pair, and it is already followed by more than one syllable, so > the "a" won't be counted as part of the word. At least, I'm pretty sure > that's how it works. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------X-archive-position: 1497 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Friday 10 April 2009 17:50:05 Minimiscience wrote: > de'i li 10 pi'e 04 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Pierre Abbat .fy. cusku zoi > skamyxatra. > > > I suggest "atrilma'e" instead. "trilma'e" is a slinku'i, so "atrilma'e" > > is valid. > > .skamyxatra > > Actually, I'm pretty sure that's not valid. "tr" is a valid initial > consonant pair, and it is already followed by more than one syllable, so > the "a" won't be counted as part of the word. At least, I'm pretty sure > that's how it works. "trilma'e" is not a valid word, since "lotrilma'e" is a lujvo. Since "trilma'e" is not a word, "a" can't fall off it. Pierre