From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Apr 16 06:49:13 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LuRxp-0001oq-18 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:49:13 -0700 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LuRxi-0001nM-Tz for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:49:12 -0700 Received: from chausie ([71.75.215.96]) by cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090416134900349.HJIJ27147.cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com> for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:49:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A132431 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:48:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: why won't jbofi'e parse this? Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:48:56 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <5715b9300904151111o1377c880j1c9b6714250873f2@mail.gmail.com> <20090416012501.GB19847@digitalkingdom.org> <5715b9300904160613l74186ba0ob0794054fab11748@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5715b9300904160613l74186ba0ob0794054fab11748@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904160948.57584.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thursday 16 April 2009 09:13:24 Luke Bergen wrote: > Would it also be acceptable to say la'e dy dy ry? Or does la'e only take > one word like zo "la'e" takes a sumti and returns a sumti. Most often the sumti is "di'u", which refers to a previous text; "la'e di'u" refers to whatever that previous text refers to. "dy dy ry" refers to the thing your playing, so "la'e dy dy ry", while grammatical, doesn't make sense. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 tX-archive-position: 1529 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Thursday 16 April 2009 09:13:24 Luke Bergen wrote: > Would it also be acceptable to say la'e dy dy ry? Or does la'e only take > one word like zo "la'e" takes a sumti and returns a sumti. Most often the sumti is "di'u", which refers to a previous text; "la'e di'u" refers to whatever that previous text refers to. "dy dy ry" refers to the thing your playing, so "la'e dy dy ry", while grammatical, doesn't make sense. Pierre