From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Apr 16 17:57:05 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LucO9-0002tz-DK for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:57:05 -0700 Received: from mx.freeshell.org ([192.94.73.19] helo=sdf.lonestar.org ident=root) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LucO4-0002sd-Mp for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:57:05 -0700 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:jwodder@iceland.freeshell.org [192.94.73.5]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3H0ur6M021451 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:56:54 GMT Received: (from jwodder@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.3/8.12.8/Submit) id n3H0uoo5004943 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:56:50 GMT Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:56:49 +0000 From: Minimiscience To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: negative-opinion text Message-ID: <20090417005648.GA5081@sdf.lonestar.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: SDF Public Access UNIX System User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: de'i li 16 pi'e 04 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Robert Rhine .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. > I read somewhere that the words were chosen algorithmically from the six > languages with the most speakers. Does anyone have any ideas what > algorithm(s) were used? .skamyxatra [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-archive-position: 1537 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: minimiscience@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners de'i li 16 pi'e 04 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Robert Rhine .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. > I read somewhere that the words were chosen algorithmically from the six > languages with the most speakers. Does anyone have any ideas what > algorithm(s) were used? .skamyxatra The {gismu} creation algorithm is described in section 4.14 of *The Complete Lojban Language*, available in various places on the web. Incidentally, the languages used were Arabic, Chinese, English, Hindi, Russian, and Spanish, though that was in 1987, and Russian's place in the top six world languages has since been supplanted by Portuguese. mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun. -- bu'u la lojbangug. lo bangu cu daspo do