From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jun 03 10:16:13 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MBu4T-0003ki-2i for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:16:13 -0700 Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.156]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MBu4N-0003kG-EA for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:16:12 -0700 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so335890ywm.46 for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:16:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VfxycdyjPGv1DAMGEUS1Un+5Xxtufh6JQKJTeuzcjQ4=; b=Bz1JYECPdotgu8FLNV809F6bKmd++5uWkmApyEb2TVw5yhdvPTGwh2uIBmPvPsQsFB iM/5YytxJXDLiBGLWoqJ3lZNQGv6Ppj4lX3hfCQmtyTCngnctj98uPx4n0kOEwba1QHn FCwG/BEbFw5I7pUgViwlQY8+VleQapoFV9z1w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FmK2XZouZ1yQS4fu8jxyrnp9/UplpuiixngnTq7gneJMAPa63ee7UgWyk2YeTPDamE mIcCw86SceDKfp1Jxj9vYHuaK/a472CsipAD1Nxr8jXK5B5N+lV0Vqw431j0lnJNXlrQ SrimV2lJr5Segz2nprG2m+vraXwBBRErvhyeM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.108.2 with SMTP id g2mr1410379anc.35.1244049366180; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:16:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4de8c3930906030838l589a6c78nc09084ec44853d6a@mail.gmail.com> References: <4de8c3930906030838l589a6c78nc09084ec44853d6a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:16:05 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17560906031016w53fd6a4wa777152989eca404@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: inversive linking From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 1754 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:38 PM, tijlan wrote: > Wouldn't it be cool if we > could do the following ("pe'ei" being an experimental, inversive > version of "pe"): > >  la .ken. pe'ei lo verba pe'ei lo plise cu gunro If "pe'ei" is in selmaho GOI, the grouping is "la .ken. pe'ei (lo verba pe'ei lo plise)", so you would need "la .ken. pe'ei lo verba ge'u pe'ei lo plise" to get the right grouping. We could also use "se pe" instead of "pe'ei", that way we don't need to add new words for the reverse of "po" and "po'e" as well, just a minor adjustment of the grammar. mu'o mi'e xorxes