From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jun 04 06:38:48 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MCD9b-0000Sm-QR for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:38:48 -0700 Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.157]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MCD9W-0000SB-KE for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:38:47 -0700 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so2464389ywm.46 for ; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:38:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KgInNBKz/Sq7m9AbL6bFoKE278dC6AZpYqjqqwEq+mo=; b=Vc+t54e7RVK+BEnkBRN1fhmOdj+1OijvPRbhu/BQHxGT0NntKhCYzIR1dcxtjDPvP9 Pnlr8IdOQNNlrjQ+bM0CL/Lsl8+6Ut5wiGCQSxlUj3iquBLdaqQzlxwARoTxXFWTgYdW ooactM/bxfLWUkqnOcG8RT36vt1AHepoOxX0E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ksl3x7zgGbIGfVlk83E4vdn79ktmHGD0fS5FzBpY9DvCv/qelY1/7fiofvMoYGei6g JQB5MJonYzG3E72eY7G8UXOHEpGVDDj+OE1wgNNe6sCMsB3u0kl2S4UNOvtDhLZmRqk0 LMNPOFtDqYpzg/L/jtyChwPIUjZyy2Abv1+hs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.98.12 with SMTP id v12mr1877548agb.77.1244122721390; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:38:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5715b9300906040627u7be16de4i7f2587979ac486a7@mail.gmail.com> References: <5715b9300906031835y6527ec5fi9b48af24030597c1@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560906040556s5952ad01re291874018bb8ed0@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9300906040627u7be16de4i7f2587979ac486a7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:38:41 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17560906040638sb43d808sfbb7e76c0500f63b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: being From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 1765 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Luke Bergen wrote: > > So then, if I wanted to explicitly specify the tense would it be grammatical > to say "do [pu|ca|ba] ca'o cladu"? Yes. mu'o mi'e xorxes