From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Aug 20 06:25:06 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Me7dY-0003Hu-U9 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:25:05 -0700 Received: from mail-vw0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Me7dS-0003Fu-B6 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:25:04 -0700 Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so4244506vws.25 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:24:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=A87w6UTq2bo9tvm3e75+LOdliPSnBeBH6UtQBXRfC8w=; b=fmn6GqvBP4GeTtP/IBMjv48R/ZU+wbsOKrBknyRprewbKEwendPn/tCi7VCYrvO2eL jg7DUs6nXr72nVyY8siEBC/2kzqj4SeB2bUAvVawc7TXxAXV4aHVd4t8P8MPLgBdyiuY 0QjoDNR4GQ7EBmQkvnrkGWA0RW3p6d0rNsddQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vP0E2Asj4IUS+zXIi8woR3IiuU9Q66y/Hy6JTWDwTqVE2LLZaoDRmZN/JmBS+mhrYY 6uJPvjDlDrQ4sgSL/qiwgaaNS0l2yzXg2GVAlfnl4QROsqY+1OrcNIkU4Ya5wE24cdkJ s51QuEF1MtyYia1V61QbLIHZHV6Fb3KqYidCQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.12.130 with SMTP id x2mr10966470vcx.75.1250774691692; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:24:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86k50yhdui.fsf@cmarib.ramside> References: <200908200041.11366.phma@phma.optus.nu> <86k50yhdui.fsf@cmarib.ramside> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:24:51 -0400 Message-ID: <5715b9300908200624j63508e38q8c380ca707654ad5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Referring to selma'o in Lojban From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485e3e5c031422c047192ad3a X-archive-position: 2047 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners --001485e3e5c031422c047192ad3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit mmm, it's a question of lojbanic-ness {zo poi} is the lojbanic word {poi} but {zoi .ry poi .ry} technically is the non-lojbanic text "poi" so it could have a different pronunciation etc... On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:25 AM, wrote: > Pierre Abbat writes: > > > zo poi na du zoi ry. poi .ry. > > Really?? That seems a bit counterintuitive. I would think that the > same word, quoted with two different quoting mechanisms, would > represent the same quote, i.e. "poi". > > > > --001485e3e5c031422c047192ad3a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable mmm, it's a question of lojbanic-ness=A0 {zo poi} is the lojbanic word = {poi} but {zoi .ry poi .ry} technically is the non-lojbanic text "poi&= quot; so it could have a different pronunciation etc...

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:25 AM, <sunrise2000@comcast.net> wrote:
Pierre Abbat <ph= ma@phma.optus.nu> writes:

> zo poi na du zoi ry. poi .ry.

Really?? =A0That seems a bit counterintuitive. =A0I would think that = the
same word, quoted with two different quoting mechanisms, would
represent the same quote, i.e. "poi".




--001485e3e5c031422c047192ad3a--