From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Aug 20 09:00:49 2009
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1MeA4H-0005G2-7R	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:00:49 -0700
Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com ([209.85.218.227])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <pascal.akihiko@gmail.com>)	id 1MeA46-0005CD-Mg	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:00:49 -0700
Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so4326174bwz.34        for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;        bh=ihZYQFtC6iyAGCTq2mzpW25NOgyWS3rnNxOMV0l7c2U=;        b=xWq1EyS0UKpJLxM2kB5Zt3rTjw/HiHEwezZ8HofsZYVQn6x+ztFHdD7WRthDIxhCQX         mMwk/O5FLMOh2uGhaHQRwOSi1zzfiAiuaMoyiIBKs/YUjJvYRatXpjVbNMNPMUPyrrZN         97hVYCnuhLhUrYosb6Uxm2aR55JbC3iau+hVQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type         :content-transfer-encoding;        b=AFYl6ytPyuu3xdScNaHYqms45KCgAt8ZQNGHanTQC4qRfLSnKxEWuKX7T4yyYEt1y+         hiSf6H9DNjJbtypAvcfoYIGEimrCFoMqrpgg1NlVZ2M6+PeM7BPbxVGX3vDZsR3WYBoR         ZCKXB8xVbS07Z0UkW9lHChCa9+fsJDr0FAYu0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.97.132 with SMTP id l4mr2235573fan.100.1250784027565; Thu, 	20 Aug 2009 09:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5715b9300908200731lc1a4ba8s642007a3a81afdba@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CDA3E5D3-659F-4215-AFFA-29816C4FD79E@choi.name>	 <4de8c3930908200722q955bd1x8bc039ed44060420@mail.gmail.com>	 <5715b9300908200731lc1a4ba8s642007a3a81afdba@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:00:27 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2a5cb630abb100ce
Message-ID: <4de8c3930908200900gb58db68ycbfb28af3d9542d7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Referring to selma'o in Lojban
From: tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
X-archive-position: 2055
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jbotijlan@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

2009/8/20 Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>:
> ooo, that's interesting?  So in {ba'e zei selma'o} does the {zei} evaluate
> first and create the lujvo first or does {ba'e} evaluate first and say "this
> is REALLY a lujvo"?
>
> I don't know why I find battle between words so interesting {zo si si si}
> etc...

This one is knotty too: zo zei si zei bu.

Or maybe not. I would like the idea that {zo}, {si}, and {bu} are the
equal components of the lujvo combined with the inner two {zei}.