From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Aug 22 12:51:01 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mewc9-0001pk-N1 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:51:01 -0700 Received: from mail-vw0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mewc6-0001ni-Il for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:51:01 -0700 Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so1198636vws.25 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:50:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0ItuU2lE5AFa1zdRhH9YdMjKH0s97jstZ2vkXAkUF8o=; b=PvdbJPxN4xyUjoIaRtInuAaASjwr0BGQCsrG23yx8ZTADdzWGLC6JPaPy/LPpW6P2W PBdrn4ceCyCa7Vy3HAnvr+YNrvvrhABRP9UY+pCZSiWuExSE3roLkQV9O5pDVw8yjoh4 GQjuyAYf59HPXrFhOaE9xIVldOhKqcfoCOiZ4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=N9tVEFm5qpdwogYv+T432xV9kAq/8o9+vI4ygKkmwWh5PoCOB0k2XQtedELb0A/tZc CF6e6JnSpv1at4ooNgKFxiHsHikbF4T26Iy/lUwuWR8UqLWfF6tFZ6o0YqEf+e4ev1Fb 26rc8NRtSjHNWHIxVZNYM4QLNrAMrd1yBs1HI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.4.25 with SMTP id 25mr3015044vcp.37.1250970652330; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:50:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4de8c3930908221226n38e5fbf0h1554794765d48876@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090821225617.GA1082@sdf.lonestar.org> <5a3750120908220037l2ea17eb1ue2dc1e3d9ce2cf65@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3930908220408g21752c12yd44abd703bae9cc5@mail.gmail.com> <5a3750120908221037u6e49bec7ra8316c82dbbf5c03@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3930908221226n38e5fbf0h1554794765d48876@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:50:52 -0400 Message-ID: <5715b9300908221250w6ee9da23r471adf911ff312df@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: "The pen is mightier than the sword." From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce04ada5b731b0471c04d94 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: my lojban is nowhere near good enough to be able to understand discussion about lojban in lojban. Could someone give me a brief synopsis of what's being said here: I gather that it's a minor disagreement having something to do with stress/emphasis of sumti? [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.1 SUBJECT_FUZZY_PENIS Attempt to obfuscate words in Subject: 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-archive-position: 2090 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners --000e0ce04ada5b731b0471c04d94 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit my lojban is nowhere near good enough to be able to understand discussion about lojban in lojban. Could someone give me a brief synopsis of what's being said here: I gather that it's a minor disagreement having something to do with stress/emphasis of sumti? On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 3:26 PM, tijlan wrote: > 2009/8/22 Oleksii Melnyk : > >>nu ro lo sumti cu terbri > > > > .ue ma bridi fi lo su'o re sumti poi ro ke'a na se basna > > no da go'i > > .i { lo pinsi } va'o { lo xarci cu vlipa mau lo pinsi } na'e te bridi > gi'e se ri'a bo pe'i mleca { lo xarci } noi te bridi ku'o lo ka se > basna > > > > --000e0ce04ada5b731b0471c04d94 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable my lojban is nowhere near good enough to be able to understand discussion a= bout lojban in lojban.=A0 Could someone give me a brief synopsis of what= 9;s being said here:=A0 I gather that it's a minor disagreement having = something to do with stress/emphasis of sumti?

On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 3:26 PM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.co= m> wrote:
2009/8/22 Oleksii Melnyk <lamelnyk@gmail.com>:
>>nu ro lo sumti cu terbri
>
> .ue ma bridi fi lo su'o re sumti poi ro ke'a na se basna

no da go'i

.i { lo pinsi } va'o { lo xarci cu vlipa mau lo pinsi } na'e te bri= di
gi'e se ri'a bo pe'i mleca { lo xarci } noi te bridi ku'o l= o ka se
basna




--000e0ce04ada5b731b0471c04d94--