From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Aug 26 22:20:49 2009
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1MgXPl-0008PO-PX	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:20:49 -0700
Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.121])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <phma@phma.optus.nu>)	id 1MgXPi-0008Ox-0F	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:20:49 -0700
Received: from chausie ([71.75.215.96]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com          with ESMTP          id <20090827052039520.GBXC8054@cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com>          for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>;          Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:20:39 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE19E2750	for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:20:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: as though
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:20:35 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
References: <5715b9300908251541m363ca5ecqd59d5542cefafb29@mail.gmail.com> <200908262333.37355.phma@phma.optus.nu> <5715b9300908262157g5d62ddaegfb810c09019b01da@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5715b9300908262157g5d62ddaegfb810c09019b01da@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200908270120.36117.phma@phma.optus.nu>
X-archive-position: 2124
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

On Thursday 27 August 2009 00:57:18 Luke Bergen wrote:
> in what way Pierre?  Just the in-directness/mental juggling of cmavo being
> done?

It's an example I made up of the three-way distinction between "be", "pe", and 
nothing preceding a tagged sumti: mi viska lo renro be pa'o lo canko be'o pe 
pa'o lo canko pa'o lo canko.

Pierre