From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Oct 02 11:28:01 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MtmrI-00021S-M5 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:28:00 -0700 Received: from mail-yw0-f195.google.com ([209.85.211.195]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MtmrE-0001z1-NM for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:28:00 -0700 Received: by ywh33 with SMTP id 33so641387ywh.25 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:27:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pkiTX4k4rrCgpPbiRE29Ji85ALuvd3VBbA2+9nou7Xo=; b=ttLx/Jblu1T4Ji9VLBn6bRbr0SM33qg7zekjSp/BELeXA/yJLxfjX4aGQk83ZhpJ+3 j3Do5e2jjuVaV4Kf/U3RWoC6yKf0tWEEaWRbHrgNwah/RXVCq6b8L1i3HgTMV5NX88B7 bpVlHVg75n47AuOkyyD7W8Rq/TiJAQtTBx1Rw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=kGtL3Ylvl2NdgiSCI1TtngCLE7LpbZvu+56OQTrCSkA6iLnupJ2L4cmVzBwkkzo284 9Mem4goU9QlKwGj9vhGkaVXocg170Mabsw1UtigZM+cmThcH3OPC35F++xp0L6HKX+WU CtL+5Twgs+SjUi9SIKC5Ilj9T3mN+1M3YpnLw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.118.35 with SMTP id q35mr4892683ybc.218.1254508069731; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:27:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7f1d42860910021120n1033c6a3wbef9131c23f2c9a0@mail.gmail.com> References: <7f1d42860910021120n1033c6a3wbef9131c23f2c9a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:27:49 -0400 Message-ID: <5715b9300910021127r211c7409h4a5eb7643e6f40b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: using 'se' in conversation From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd70a54dd3f200474f7ebbb X-archive-position: 2430 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners --000e0cd70a54dd3f200474f7ebbb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I *think* that the first one is ok, although I would tend to say {da poi mi viska cu xamgu}. {xamgu} is good. {gleki} is happy. likewise, I *think* that the second one is ok, but again, I would find it more natural to say {mi viska da poi citka ke'a} On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Ryan Leach wrote: > Are these how I would say the following > 1. What I see is good > 2. I see what is eaten > > 1. le mi se viska cu gleki > 2. mi viska le se citka > > If not please advise. > > -- > =93Nothing bothers me more than sloth. The objective is to fix mistakes > of ambition and not make mistakes of sloth. I work my ass off.=94 > -Tim Ferriss > > > > --000e0cd70a54dd3f200474f7ebbb Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think that the first one is ok, although I would tend to say {da p= oi mi viska cu xamgu}.=A0 {xamgu} is good.=A0 {gleki} is happy.

like= wise, I think that the second one is ok, but again, I would find it = more natural to say {mi viska da poi citka ke'a}

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Ryan Leach <= span dir=3D"ltr"><rsw.leach@gmail= .com> wrote:
Are these how I would say the following
1. What I see is good
2. I see what is eaten

1. le mi se viska cu gleki
2. mi viska le se citka

If not please advise.

--
=93Nothing bothers me more than sloth. The objective is to fix mistakes
of ambition and not make mistakes of sloth. I work my ass off.=94
-Tim Ferriss




--000e0cd70a54dd3f200474f7ebbb--