From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Oct 02 12:01:37 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MtnNp-0005yA-11 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:01:37 -0700 Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com ([209.85.220.225]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MtnNj-0005x1-Nt for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:01:35 -0700 Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so1409942fxm.0 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:01:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zOBbwFdYOVU1HBmgBXxPB5KC4fzBCQwLVpRHa3/k1u0=; b=UffFuvZDMygOc/lLP5Qzj3+4bqLQU3uI3rUeEwQL7w90R6A+i/MBkvHIrxN09+xlxZ 8Kg9KWg9Vrgp4s8Jv2pmbCp+3Sdiocax8SHBU7CzqxySSvhUiDgP6wwYhNit8xWCe70u yF9aOtoxFCCma6KidJDKCzk/9PumG1Nax7SdE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=cVxgLsd1+N7noshtsV28llb4DRj5tniVKkev0BDt3b+5vsZgCIqAtxNBaJGuBYY74Z B8nzn6qsjtMUvvqDaTa95wUu3lsmNYHkrYVhq0Posk4/ENTfLpMUivmVtIYKZz1AzROe OoY17u0tZlhGcMk4JpiEHBPQq1Pdao9e8ky+8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.179.99 with SMTP id c35mr259843hbg.161.1254510084031; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:01:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7f1d42860910021120n1033c6a3wbef9131c23f2c9a0@mail.gmail.com> References: <7f1d42860910021120n1033c6a3wbef9131c23f2c9a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:01:23 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5b604d3db13494a1 Message-ID: <12d58c160910021201n99dcc7fyd2b482c115dc3cda@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: using 'se' in conversation From: "komfo,amonan" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f7d8deed03eb0474f86372 X-archive-position: 2433 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: komfoamonan@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners --001485f7d8deed03eb0474f86372 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Ryan Leach wrote: > Are these how I would say the following > 1. What I see is good > 2. I see what is eaten > > 1. le mi se viska cu gleki > I'd go with {le se viska be mi cu xamgu} (depending on the context, {xamgu} might not be right here. {mansa} is a possibility). > 2. mi viska le se citka > Yes. mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan --001485f7d8deed03eb0474f86372 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Ryan Leach <rsw.leach@gmail.com= > wrote:
Are these how I would say the following
1. What I see is good
2. I see what is eaten

1. le mi se viska cu gleki
I'd go with {le se visk= a be mi cu xamgu} (depending on the context, {xamgu} might not be right her= e. {mansa} is a possibility).
2. mi viska le se citka
Yes.

mu'o m= i'e komfo,amonan
--001485f7d8deed03eb0474f86372--