From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Feb 25 08:28:21 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:28:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NkgZY-0004Yk-43 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:28:21 -0800 Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com ([74.125.82.181]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NkgZU-0004Xr-2m for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:28:19 -0800 Received: by wyb39 with SMTP id 39so1846558wyb.40 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:28:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jnrBq4d1JfNZUjv43eU+6fSPwiCqp4mHDmcG6A0PIg4=; b=mpYIoCSY60YhTPB+KqpgNx4SRa/rIAd9iFp2gRQSHryr41+quJKIPXxyGmpIo1ulo0 O5Qww3l21Ui0W2RqRFsRUxBripu0K7wm53ExLGIS1LOiwG6XUKchp2ThnTEmI14uuWZW sjmYq/4qybViLcQvuocFamh/NRe23zCL3kSo8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=w9etZ5cXGw5Am8UfmSRswuyLW/jsVlG/p690DhppG2uUso3zuiXyvWvuNOpqavOL4j eQ22inTtc6OyrtEwGqVEnbtyMRu3IpuXZOstsoeAnOgEVDzXeeAUoKJx2Ku4HCHPoKzw RBAYCEPIX2ZHM2WPz+waT4hYjz8n94GuZPcyU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.202 with SMTP id c52mr812035wef.84.1267115288021; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:28:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <27513e551002250819j5eaeb6cu778beee34de17b3@mail.gmail.com> References: <1f1080831002250758rb17bd2dk664e035452c298e4@mail.gmail.com> <27513e551002250812q113eb835if5b4c5d7d1b06625@mail.gmail.com> <27513e551002250819j5eaeb6cu778beee34de17b3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:28:07 -0500 Message-ID: <1f1080831002250828o67a06e3pbc0460a7ac7b89af@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Tenses in abstractions From: Ian Johnson To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 2900 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: blindbravado@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Hmm...somehow it seems like using two {sumti tcita} derived from the same {gismu} is kinda doing it wrong, to me. I think you probably COULD use ti'u and teti'u, but it seems like that would be a clunky way to do it. mu'omi'e latros. On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Oren wrote: > oh, could this use { teti'u } ? > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 00:12, Oren wrote: >> I'll piggy back this fanva cpedu >> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 23:58, Ian Johnson wrote: >>> ma lenu do pu co'a sipna cu tcika le prulamcte (be le cabdei) >> >> .i mi troci >> >> { .i ma tcika lo nu do sipna lo prulamcte } >> >> .i drani xu >> > > > >