From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 17 15:36:51 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:36:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ns1r9-0008LY-0L for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:36:51 -0700 Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.92.149]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ns1r4-0008KW-3k for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:36:50 -0700 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so216083qwc.58 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:36:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mdEWBXaALuuCNV8O1joxuPtpt0hreIeOndnOj1b2aQs=; b=piVICJ/eMprBMsNdjLcNYsJ4BrAQ75Q+FM+cfUPjsyAiS3arkxzKFDVQJy5Od0Y+xl 09siIY3c9uhtXwLlinW1BDACfYjJS7UUjrQPlNxPiQZkxNEOsGReZ6/X6kl+ecbHqxhs yJEt/VX+63T7H2q2pmhUNkWvilvSTocanzdSE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=I5jvjMz96ofh2hYx34DbX0k/0A0iHO0kArB2pYj6SKTkT2M4M9Fr7pRkJpkHrD9g3k CRGtNN4w+UV4hz+W/rpz2lSwCIzEFlkyt51E+yKyLLJGxfZF/Pk3mF9pLNihGvAx3whp sn2eB1Q/8MqeK3SLeRW355M/56nM0gxuNThic= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.89.134 with SMTP id e6mr488810qam.297.1268865404760; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:36:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <12d58c161003171525v3acabd3fqeed41dab38fac0b7@mail.gmail.com> References: <4BA14159.6020608@perpetuum-immobile.de> <12d58c161003171525x4b62f03m8eaf0e81e30675fc@mail.gmail.com> <12d58c161003171525v3acabd3fqeed41dab38fac0b7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:36:44 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: coi? From: Geoffrey Stewart To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000feaf11553b7f3f3048206bf32 X-archive-position: 3029 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: geoffstewart56@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners --000feaf11553b7f3f3048206bf32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:25 PM, komfo,amonan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:25 PM, komfo,amonan wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Geoffrey Stewart < >> geoffstewart56@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Timo Paulssen < >>> timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote: >>> >>>> Geoffrey Stewart wrote: >>>> > Hello, is this the Lojban beginner's mailing list? (otherwise I'm >>>> going to >>>> > look like a fool...) >>>> Yes, you really are right here. >>> >>> >>>> > Assuming it is, coi! I've been learning the language for a few months >>>> now >>>> > and thought I'd say hello. >>>> Aaw, it's a pity you're so late to the party :) >>>> >>>> fi'i djefris, Welcome to the mailing list! You should also consider >>>> stopping by >>>> the IRC channel some day, too. It's all good fun there :) >>>> > >>>> > mu'omi'e djefris. >>>> > >>>> >>>> mu'o mi'e timos >>>> >>> >>> Great, good to see I'm in the right place. >>> >>> .i mi'e djefris. .i mi kadnu gi'e se bangu le glico .e le fraso .e le >>> latmo to so'u toi .e le lojbo to ji'a so'u toi >>> >>> I hope my sentences were constructed properly. By the way, why is it >>> kadno, and not something closer like kando or knado? >>> >> >> coi fi'i >> >> *{kando} would conflict with {kandi}; their 4-letter & 5-letter rafsi >> would be the same. *{knado} includes a forbidden initial consonant pair. ( >> *Complete Lojban Language* 3:7) >> >> mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan >> > > Er, "their 4-letter rafsi would be the same". > > .e'o I guess I'll just have to live with it then. mu'o mi'e djefris --000feaf11553b7f3f3048206bf32 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:25 PM, komfo,amonan <komfoamonan@gm= ail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:25 PM, komfo,amonan <kom= foamonan@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Geoffrey Stewart &l= t;geoffstewar= t56@gmail.com> wrote:


On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Timo Paulssen <<= a href=3D"mailto:timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de" target=3D"_blank">timonat= or@perpetuum-immobile.de> wrote:
Geoffrey Stewart wrote:
> Hello, is this the Lojban beginner'= ;s mailing list? (otherwise I'm going to
> look like a fool...)
Yes, you really are right here.=A0

> Assuming it is, coi! I've been learning the language for = a few months now
> and thought I'd say hello.
Aaw, it= 9;s a pity you're so late to the party :)

fi'i djefris, Welc= ome to the mailing list! You should also consider stopping by
the IRC channel some day, too. It's all good fun there :)
>
&g= t; mu'omi'e djefris.
>

mu'o mi'e timos

Great, good to see I'm in the right place.

.i mi'e = djefris. .i mi kadnu gi'e se bangu le glico .e le fraso .e le latmo to = so'u toi .e le lojbo to ji'a so'u toi

I hope my sentence= s were constructed properly. By the way, why is it kadno, and not something= closer like kando or knado?

coi fi'i

*{kando} would conflict with {kandi}; their 4-= letter & 5-letter rafsi would be the same. *{knado} includes a forbidde= n initial consonant pair. (Complete Lojban Language 3:7)

mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan

Er, "their 4-letter rafsi would be the same".=A0

.e'o=A0 I guess I'll just have to live with it then.
mu'o mi'e djefris
--000feaf11553b7f3f3048206bf32--