From opifex@mail.ru Tue Oct 29 05:14:04 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 29 Oct 2002 05:14:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx9.mail.ru ([194.67.57.19])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 186WC4-000868-00
	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 05:14:04 -0800
Received: from drweb by mx9.mail.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim MX.9)
	id 186WC1-00056W-00
	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:14:01 +0300
Received: from f9.int ([10.0.0.77] helo=f9.mail.ru)
	by mx9.mail.ru with esmtp (Exim MX.9)
	id 186WBW-0004eY-00
	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:13:30 +0300
Received: from mail by f9.mail.ru with local (Exim FE.1)
	id 186WBU-0006pN-00
	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:13:28 +0300
Received: from [213.156.130.9] by win.mail.ru with HTTP;
	Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:13:28 +0300
From: "selxar" <opifex@mail.ru>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [213.156.130.9]
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:13:28 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <E186WBU-0006pN-00@f9.mail.ru>
X-archive-position: 6
X-Approved-By: jkominek@miranda.org
Subject:  (no subject)
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: opifex@mail.ru
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

coi rodo 

.i dei selcfika nalpavysmuni
.i dei selcfi ka nalpavysmuni

Looking at some gismu I found out that they seem to be composed of two parts - a cmavo and a rafsi of another gismu. Could this lead to ambiguity if they are run together in a string?
Here are some examples I doubt about (meaningful for the most part)

selckasu - selcka su
xu srasu - xusra su
mo srasu - mosra su 
selgrasu - selgra su 
selstasu - selsta su
selprosa - selpro sa
seldjica - seldji ca
le selckiku - le selcki ku
selclite tavla - selcli te tavla
ti selckape mi - ti selcka pe mi 
selcreka taxfu - selcre ka taxfu
le pa greku - le pagre ku
da spoja jelca - daspo ja jelca

In oral speech these could be distinguished by terbasna, but what if they are allowed to be *written* together?
Hope I'm being mistaken somehow.

mi'e selxar