From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Feb 28 07:01:09 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:01:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from f183.law8.hotmail.com ([216.33.241.183] helo=hotmail.com) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18om0b-0005SB-00 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:01:09 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:00:39 -0800 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:00:38 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] From: "Jorge Llambias" To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: {nalgundei} Would somebody like to check this, please? Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:00:38 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2003 15:00:39.0209 (UTC) FILETIME=[2801A990:01C2DF3A] X-archive-position: 193 X-Approved-By: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners la jexOm cusku di'e >mi puza mo'u se nalgundei ka'a la lojbanistan. I would expect the x2 of {nalgundei} to be a number, the number of days of vacation, and perhaps x3 to be the non-worker. But there are no strict rules for this. {seka'a la lojbanistan}, if that was the destination. {ka'a} tags the goer. >.i ti te kacma le nu lo co'a cerni zo'e le ca'u xaskoi {le nu co'a cerni}, no {lo} in front of {co'a cerni}. I would probably use {di'e} instead of {ti}. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963