From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Feb 03 10:06:39 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 03 Feb 2003 10:06:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18fkzO-0004Ma-00 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 10:06:38 -0800 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:06:38 -0800 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Robin's Tagline Message-ID: <20030203180638.GB13520@digitalkingdom.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 53 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:33:12AM +0100, Newton, Philip wrote: > (Question: Are both of {.i xu lu cridrnoma li'u fu'ivla} and {.i xu zo > cridrnoma fu'ivla} equally acceptable?) I am not aware of any distinction between the two. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi