From hokstein@free.elogica.com.br Tue Feb 11 19:26:05 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:37:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [200.185.56.14] (helo=br.inter.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18inX9-0007iR-00 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:26:04 -0800 Received: from 141137.telemar.net.br ([200.165.141.137] helo=oliveira) by br.inter.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 18inLt-00006E-00 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 01:14:27 -0200 Message-ID: <009a01c2d246$70136c60$15180aac@oliveira> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Ricardo_Oliveira?= To: References: Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Loglan Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 23:59:17 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005C_01C2D229.9667EAC0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-archive-position: 89 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: hokstein@free.elogica.com.br Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005C_01C2D229.9667EAC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Philip wrote: > I thought his question was "I heard that Loglan : Lojban :: Esperanto = : Ido. > Is that true?" That is, asking about the relationship rather than the > language itself. Exactly. :-) The FAQ does adresses the question, but it gives almost no information = as to why the two groups split up. Did they disagree about some Loglan = feature? Was it about the way the Loglan Institute was being run? Also, I would like to know what are the differences between Loglan and = Lojban as to linguistics. I agree with Robin when he says that Esperanto is a "mushing of European = languages". It is kind of arrogant that it tries to pass itself as the = "solution to the language problem". That's what caught my attention at = first about Lojban: it is "more neutral" than Esperanto, Ido, = Interlingua, Glosa and others. By the way, I'd like to congratulate Robin and Nick about their great = introduction to the language! :-) Jo=E3o Ricardo Oliveira ------=_NextPart_000_005C_01C2D229.9667EAC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Philip wrote:

> I thought his question was "I heard that Loglan : Lojban :: = Esperanto=20 : Ido.
> Is that true?" That is, asking about the relationship = rather than=20 the
> language itself.

Exactly. :-)

The FAQ does adresses the question, but it gives almost no = information as=20 to why the two groups split up. Did they disagree about some Loglan = feature? Was=20 it about the way the Loglan Institute was being run?

Also, I would like to know what are the differences between Loglan = and=20 Lojban as to linguistics.

I agree with Robin when he says that Esperanto is a "mushing of = European=20 languages". It is kind of arrogant that it tries to pass itself as the = "solution=20 to the language problem". That's what caught my attention at first about = Lojban:=20 it is "more neutral" than Esperanto, Ido, Interlingua, Glosa and = others.

By the way, I'd like to congratulate Robin and Nick about their = great=20 introduction to the language! :-)

Jo=E3o Ricardo Oliveira

------=_NextPart_000_005C_01C2D229.9667EAC0--