From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon May 05 23:41:41 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 05 May 2003 23:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
	id 19Cw8z-0005XI-00
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 23:41:41 -0700
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 23:41:41 -0700
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: coi lojban.
Message-ID: <20030506064141.GE7295@digitalkingdom.org>
References: <200305020753.h427rs624168@mail.cjb.net> <20030502165610.GG6079@digitalkingdom.org> <20030505175322.GA1309@panda.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030505175322.GA1309@panda.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
X-archive-position: 301
X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 01:53:22AM +0800, tk1@despammed.com wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> > The word formation rules are about the only *syntactic* rules
> > Lojban has.
> > http://www.lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter4.html

For the record, I used the word 'syntactic' incorrectly there, so
that comment of mine should be ignored.

-Robin

-- 
Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***   I'm a *male* Robin.
"but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me"
-- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org
http://www.lojban.org/             ***              .i cimo'o prali .ui