From philip.newton@gmail.com Mon Dec 20 06:01:26 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:01:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CgO6H-0002Me-Ui for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:01:26 -0800 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y7so309591rne for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:00:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=PfAQ7vTx/MczLvOksfuDerQ0JWfo3c64vTaj9VoPfEy7h+WBfBXr9SHmve9FS5TKS+D9IjMJ7hB0ab27j9liuHH71MLbgHNifm12IgIbsdFPPFi5n3lofAmsu//NXoR65i+5qqTUbC3pSeB/QkaRekBCpVeNIavEb5DLm0+8mvk= Received: by 10.39.3.51 with SMTP id f51mr430500rni; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:00:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.208.51 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:00:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <537d06d004122006004b0c4591@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:00:54 +0100 From: Philip Newton To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: lo nanmu poi na va In-Reply-To: <200412171452.iBHEqDIP014914@mole.e-mol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII References: <200411231632.iANGW4IP015504@mole.e-mol.com> <12d58c1604112309403ae9d3fe@mail.gmail.com> <200411231944.iANJiMIP025557@mole.e-mol.com> <12d58c160411231406380fc4f2@mail.gmail.com> <200411240332.iAO3WbIP030051@mole.e-mol.com> <537d06d00411240121c80798b@mail.gmail.com> <200411291907.iATJ7EIP026153@mole.e-mol.com> <41C13D12.1010507@gulik.co.nz> <200412171452.iBHEqDIP014914@mole.e-mol.com> X-archive-position: 952 X-Approved-By: philip.newton@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: philip.newton@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:52:13 -0500, Matt Arnold wrote: > Did I really use a plural somehow? I thought a plural would have "lei" or "loi" instead of "lo." No, {lo nanmu} is ambiguous with respect to number and could mean "a man" or "some men". mu'o mi'e .filip. -- Philip Newton