From grey.havens@online.fr Thu Jan 20 06:35:58 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:49:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from a.mx.zettai.net ([207.58.154.6]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1CrdPh-0002Oy-SG for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 06:35:58 -0800 Received: (qmail 25661 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jan 2005 14:35:56 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.0.8 ppid: 25649, pid: 25658, t: 0.2697s scanners: clamav: 0.80/m:28/d:625 spam: 3.0.1 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.40.69?) (mail@raphael.poss.name@163.5.254.20) by 0 with SMTP; 20 Jan 2005 14:35:56 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <41EEFA48.7020900@gulik.co.nz> References: <41EEFA48.7020900@gulik.co.nz> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-56--924385582" Message-Id: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_Poss?= Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: apostrophes? Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:37:13 +0100 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on beta.zettai.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TW_OJ autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-archive-position: 1046 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: grey.havens@online.fr Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners --Apple-Mail-56--924385582 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Le 20 janv. 05, =E0 01:24, Michael van der Gulik a =E9crit : > Why does Lojban use apostrophes instead of "h"'s? It seems much more=20= > natural to use "h"'s, as it keeps words together (consider that an=20 > apo'stro'phe ins'er'ts sp'ac'es i'n'to wo'rds, breaking them up and=20 > making them harder to read as one word). > > Is it acceptable to use, e.g. "keha" instead of "ke'a"? Or will people=20= > become angry? Hmm... I'd rather write "ke=B7a", "ke=A8a", "ke=B0a" or even "ke:a" to = keep=20 it ASCII. a co:lon do:es not ins:er:t sp:ac:es i:n:to wo:rds... at least not too=20= much :) --=20 Rapha=EBl= --Apple-Mail-56--924385582 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?= content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFB78Ic18ht0zty5ysRAuJhAJ9gLUHp1JI7YCNZz2ZSzpAlkdEhTACgqDCs 5p1o7mJ4Ks+JesNtFapOmSA= =9DYv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-56--924385582--