From betsemes@hotmail.com Fri Feb 04 12:52:32 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:52:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bay23-dav12.bay23.hotmail.com ([64.4.22.192] helo=hotmail.com)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CxARM-0006bB-Ar
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:52:32 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:52:00 -0800
Message-ID: <BAY23-DAV12B12B6184454A0F0E3065D1700@phx.gbl>
Received: from 65.218.132.157 by BAY23-DAV12.phx.gbl with DAV;
	Fri, 04 Feb 2005 20:51:49 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [65.218.132.157]
X-Originating-Email: [betsemes@hotmail.com]
X-Sender: betsemes@hotmail.com
From: "Betsemes" <betsemes@hotmail.com>
To: <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <20050204200632.33147.qmail@web41908.mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: lo brivla valsi
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:44:53 -0400
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2005 20:52:00.0494 (UTC) FILETIME=[5F7BB8E0:01C50AFB]
X-archive-position: 1110
X-Approved-By: betsemes@hotmail.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: betsemes@hotmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

> I doubt the change will be very noticeable in usage. If you take
> any old usage of lo, chances are it fits better with the "new" lo
> than with "su'o lo". You chose yourself "lo brivla cu valsi"
> as your first translation of "brivla are words", so where do
> you expect to find confusion?
>

Precisely where someone intended "lo" to mean "su'o lo".