From mikevdg@gulik.co.nz Fri Feb 25 12:18:54 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:54:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from genamics.blastula.net ([205.214.85.184])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1D4lvK-00047B-Pj
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:18:54 -0800
Received: from [203.184.5.249] (helo=gulik.co.nz)
	by genamics.blastula.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D4lvI-0001gh-Gs
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:18:53 +1300
Message-ID: <421F8831.5060601@gulik.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:18:57 +1300
From: Michael van der Gulik <mikevdg@gulik.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040216 Debian/1.6.x.1-10
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: .eosai ko viska le ckule jibri be mi
References: <421EA747.80406@gulik.co.nz> <537d06d0050225032046d7f713@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <537d06d0050225032046d7f713@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - genamics.blastula.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gulik.co.nz
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
X-archive-position: 1173
X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: mikevdg@gulik.co.nz
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

.ui ki'e .filip.

Mikevdg.

Philip Newton wrote:

>On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:19:19 +1300, Michael van der Gulik
><mikevdg@gulik.co.nz> wrote:
>  
>
>>mi ba'o cikre la skami be mi (I'm tweaking my computer)
>>    
>>
>
>I think you want {le skami pe mi} (or, alternatively, {le mi skami})
>here rather than {la skami be mi}; 1) I don't think you're using
>"computer" as a name, and 2) x2 of "skami" is the computer's purpose,
>rather than its owner.
>
>  
>
>>le skami be mi cu spoja
>>    
>>
>
>It exploded? Or were you looking for {spofu}?
>
>  
>
>>mi jimpe fi skami (I understand something about computers)
>>    
>>
>
>That needs a gadri after {fi} - I'll guess {lo}, so {mi jimpe fi lo skami}.
>
>  
>
>>mi djuno le nu zo'e kau klama le zarci (I know WHO went to the store)
>>    
>>
>
>I believe that {ma kau}, rather than {zo'e kau}, is what you wan
>there, and probably {le/lo du'u} rather than {le nu}: {mi djuno lodu'u
>makau klama le zarci}.
>
>mu'o mi'e .filip.
>  
>