From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Mar 14 20:57:46 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:30:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DB47m-0003KD-5A for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:57:46 -0800 Received: from genamics.blastula.net ([205.214.85.184]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.44) id 1DB47Z-0003K4-Oi for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:57:46 -0800 Received: from [203.184.5.201] (helo=gulik.co.nz) by genamics.blastula.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DB47Y-0006Ip-98 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:57:33 +1300 Message-ID: <42366B3A.8020803@gulik.co.nz> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:57:30 +1300 From: Michael van der Gulik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040216 Debian/1.6.x.1-10 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: example sentences References: <65.411599d2.2f668780@wmconnect.com> <423604BD.9070708@brucewebber.com> In-Reply-To: <423604BD.9070708@brucewebber.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - genamics.blastula.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - chain.digitalkingdom.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gulik.co.nz X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 1253 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: mikevdg@gulik.co.nz Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners Bruce Webber wrote: > MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > >> In a message dated 2/25/2005 5:23:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, >> mikevdg via ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: >> >>> mi ba'o cikre la skami be mi (I'm tweaking my computer) >> >> >> *le* skami > > > Mikevdg, > > In addition to using "le" in place of "la", I don't think "be" is > correct. (I don't have the earlier messages in this thread; I > apologize if this has already been discussed.) The x2 place of skami > is the purpose of the computer, so "le skami be me" would be "the > computer for the purpose of me", which I don't think makes sense. > > Perhaps what you meant was "le skami pe mi" or, more succinctly, "le > mi skami". Yes; I confused "be" with "pe" and I meant "le skami pe mi". I'm also having trouble with confusing goi / go'i, co'a / co'e, ka'e / ki'e / ko'a / ku'i / ki'a :-). I'll get there. Mikevdg.