From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 16 07:51:47 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:51:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DBaoF-0004t0-Fj for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:51:47 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.198]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DBao9-0004sa-Rg for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:51:47 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so3262002wri for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:51:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=MwJEyT0OK5OQsIQyT6WcIS2g9J4hOVBynNHvncv+X0pRkSxLY/73ftq/M/ZZ92b4UMZDwb3cIZ7GV2YXBTkHKzBOtE7ukM7kuylrmuz4hayFPZP2Uzm5MLtbit7mnf5LoHmaw6MF6CR5PrT9dbXI11cSg0lKoE9dlBNX87mn2W8= Received: by 10.54.13.52 with SMTP id 52mr227505wrm; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:51:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.35.76 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:51:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <12d58c16050316075119c0ebc3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:51:09 -0500 From: Adam COOPER To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: nu fanva zoi gy. I pledge allegiance... .gy In-Reply-To: <20050316132404.3844.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <20050316132404.3844.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 1258 X-Approved-By: adamgarrigus@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners > i do nitcu zo ce'a lo nu ca'a nupre gi'e po'esti i se cau zo ce'a > do pilno le valsi lo nu skicu e nai lo nu nupre gi'e po'esti > > mu'o mi'e xorxes .ui nai ru'e mi bilga lo nu spuda bau lo glibau .i ri'a bo do cremau mi lo nu se bangu lo jbobau ku .e lo sanbau vau zo'o I fail to understand the role of {ce'a} here. Is it due to the {lu ... li'u}? Because I only used {lu ... li'u} to stick the sentence in the x5 slot of {fanva}. In the actual text the statement stands on its own. ki'e do .i mu'o mi'e .adam.