From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Apr 09 16:21:59 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DKPH5-0005lN-3f
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:21:59 -0700
Received: from tomts15.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.3] helo=tomts15-srv.bellnexxia.net)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DKPH4-0005lF-8K
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:21:59 -0700
Received: from mxmta.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.18])
          by tomts15-srv.bellnexxia.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with SMTP
          id <20050409232156.YBT1680.tomts15-srv.bellnexxia.net@mxmta.bellnexxia.net>
          for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>;
          Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:21:56 -0400
From: <jacqueslen@sympatico.ca>
To: <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Grammar question
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 19:21:56 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Message-Id: <20050409232156.YBT1680.tomts15-srv.bellnexxia.net@mxmta.bellnexxia.net>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 1366
X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: jacqueslen@sympatico.ca
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

coi ro do

I've been told that {klama be la moreal.} parses as a selbri. now I see two possible ways to parse {se klama be la moreal.}:
{{se klama} be la moreal} and
{se {klama be la moreal}
I've been told the first one is the correct one, but why?
--Jacques