From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Apr 11 08:18:52 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DL0gd-0004O7-VN
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:51 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.201])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DL0gb-0004Np-Dl
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:51 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1391762wra
        for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=Z1Gr1/2mqgnseFhIp6h+Hy0d/qVlTK/Mp0OhJ/juFIZWr4tYmei8OwrI1nqrUAEJO9sxMIJ74PfTcTcMu134rP66uyKjc50earmvMRATU4hjezzqXnH0jC5mSFZp+/jMozj6JfY+AxG/oUH/4//dc8T/dagUzG5ADB+aws+lI4A=
Received: by 10.54.10.54 with SMTP id 54mr1266009wrj;
        Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.35.76 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <12d58c160504110818353ecdb3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:18:13 -0400
From: Adam COOPER <adamgarrigus@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Rafsi question; was Denoting counterfactual sentences in Lojban?
In-Reply-To: <200504111456.j3BEucTd032528@mole.e-mol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1528_32498929.1113232693670"
References: <20050408204144.GC26545@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
	 <JNEIJCJJHIEAILJBFHILAECCEHAA.ben@goertzel.org>
	 <20050408232158.GQ26545@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
	 <200504111456.j3BEucTd032528@mole.e-mol.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 1373
X-Approved-By: adamgarrigus@gmail.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

------=_Part_1528_32498929.1113232693670
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

You'll want to run the lujvo-making algorithm. It's described in the=20
Reference Grammar, but there may also be some software available.

On Apr 11, 2005 10:56 AM, Matt Arnold <mattarn@123.net> wrote:
>=20
> When a root word has more than one abbreviated form, is there ever a=20
> rationale to use one and not the other in a particular compound word? The=
=20
> only reason I have ever thought of was to prevent unpronouncable consonan=
t=20
> combinations.
> - epkat
>

------=_Part_1528_32498929.1113232693670
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

You'll want to run the lujvo-making algorithm. It's described in the
Reference Grammar, but there may also be some software available.<br><br><d=
iv><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On Apr 11, 2005 10:56 AM, <b class=3D"gmail_=
sendername">Matt Arnold</b> &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mattarn@123.net">mattarn@=
123.net</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"bor=
der-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-=
left: 1ex;">When
a root word has more than one abbreviated form, is there ever a
rationale to use one and not the other in a particular compound word?
The only reason I have ever thought of was to prevent unpronouncable
consonant combinations.<br>- epkat<br>
</blockquote></div>
------=_Part_1528_32498929.1113232693670--