From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jul 21 11:39:36 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1DvfxI-0002yq-3K
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:39:36 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.202])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1DvfxC-0002yh-F5
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:39:35 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 57so44718wri
        for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=H2+PrpOL0E4YnklmzsW4LItxAJo6f7/zVdhqwOMSMQqfwcNcSGRNGlFEvVhaP6bGBQ1X+IxBD0FmGLpQn6mEjqIZeWtLTE+E+5i5IyudDgKVSKSapHGY7e8fOtgON5MRKQlRWZGqkXjUfYBiIwrdOj/stJYbz4TCf84iYIUukSk=
Received: by 10.54.73.15 with SMTP id v15mr647899wra;
        Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.35.75 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <12d58c160507211139575ac25b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:39:03 -0400
From: Adam COOPER <adamgarrigus@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: [lojban-beginners]
In-Reply-To: <63E52E63CA0C8843A438A3410289264AD4B7A9@mail.datair.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4536_20527486.1121971143375"
References: <63E52E63CA0C8843A438A3410289264AD4B7A9@mail.datair.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 1613
X-Approved-By: adamgarrigus@gmail.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

------=_Part_4536_20527486.1121971143375
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 7/21/05, Scott Weller <ScottW@datair.com> wrote:
>=20
> Come to think of it, do any old-timers know why the cultual gismu is=20
> {skoto}
> instead of {skato}? [... snip ...] Perhaps the Scottish pronunciation of
> "Scot" is closer to {skot} than {skat}.
>=20

Absolutely. [I'm not Scottish, but I did live there for a bit.]

------=_Part_4536_20527486.1121971143375
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 7/21/05, <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Scott Weller</b> &lt;<a href=3D"m=
ailto:ScottW@datair.com">ScottW@datair.com</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class=
=3D"gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-l=
eft: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left:=
 1ex;">
Come to think of it, do any old-timers know why the cultual gismu is {skoto=
}<br>instead of {skato}?&nbsp; [... snip ...] Perhaps the Scottish pronunci=
ation of<br>&quot;Scot&quot; is closer to {skot} than {skat}.<br></blockquo=
te>
</div><br>Absolutely. [I'm not Scottish, but I did live there for a bit.]<b=
r>


------=_Part_4536_20527486.1121971143375--