From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jul 22 06:45:14 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1Dvxpy-0007c2-AV
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:45:14 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.198])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1Dvxpt-0007bp-CV
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:45:14 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 57so357743wri
        for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=g7VlGk9E7XnhVBvyHoTYyKo4h7LHt5wIDPAQaSIE+6nUATRs6pRLp7jawI5SNsWSVnIZIa2MAvCxMiFN3JlrO63uWrJtqMBq+mO56dgzSvpLDQnK5BvUjexzEHC5m+/oXlqhOawl5EvZQyV2f9a9w7X2UVq8VccH/KfJL1nogqA=
Received: by 10.54.110.11 with SMTP id i11mr1202222wrc;
        Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.35.75 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <12d58c1605072206457c6bd606@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:45:08 -0400
From: Adam COOPER <adamgarrigus@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Hello
In-Reply-To: <200507212256.27540.sekenre@ukfsn.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_514_12679424.1122039908465"
References: <200507212256.27540.sekenre@ukfsn.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 1619
X-Approved-By: adamgarrigus@gmail.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

------=_Part_514_12679424.1122039908465
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 7/21/05, Kio M. Smallwood <sekenre@ukfsn.org> wrote:
>=20
> Is their a particular reason why lojban has no "th" sound? Are their=20
> sounds,
> which are common in other languages, that lojban has deliberately avoided=
?


Thanks for all the Scotland stuff. I'd forgotten about "och aye". -- The=20
"th" sound IMHO is not all that common, I think. Even in English dialects i=
t=20
devolves to /f/ (London) & /t/ (USA) often enough. In Spanish it devolved t=
o=20
/s/ in the south & thence to all of Spanish-America. Arabic has it, but=20
otherwise does it show up in Asia at all?

------=_Part_514_12679424.1122039908465
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 7/21/05, <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Kio M. Smallwood</b> &lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:sekenre@ukfsn.org">sekenre@ukfsn.org</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"borde=
r-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-le=
ft: 1ex;">
Is their a particular reason why lojban has no &quot;th&quot; sound? Are th=
eir sounds,<br>which are common in other languages, that lojban has deliber=
ately avoided?</blockquote><div><br>
<span style=3D"font-family: georgia;">Thanks for all the Scotland stuff.
I'd forgotten about &quot;och aye&quot;. -- The &quot;th&quot; sound IMHO i=
s not all that
common, I think. Even in English dialects it devolves to /f/ (London)
&amp; /t/ (USA) often enough. In Spanish it devolved to /s/ in the
south &amp; thence to all of Spanish-America. Arabic has it, but
otherwise does it show up in Asia at all?</span> <br>
</div><br></div>

------=_Part_514_12679424.1122039908465--