From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Aug 22 08:33:14 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E7EIT-0006vt-Re for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:33:13 -0700 Received: from mailgw6.gedas.de ([139.1.44.12]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E7EIN-0006vh-TV for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:33:13 -0700 Received: from mailgw6.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw6.gedas.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7MFX48t016634 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:33:04 +0200 Received: from blnsem08.de.gedas-grp (blnsem08.gedas.de [139.1.84.54]) by mailgw6.gedas.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7MFX4Kf016628 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:33:04 +0200 Received: by blnsem08.de.gedas-grp with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:33:04 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Newton, Philip" To: "'lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org'" Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: ...to say 'coi' Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:33:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 1813 X-Approved-By: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners la .xili,odor. cu cusku di'e > Is this sentence right and legal, please: > > lenu cusku lu coi li'u kei te rinsa Yes, but it probably doesn't mean what you intend -- you're missing a {ku} or a {cu}. {lo nu cusku lu coi li'u kei cu te rinsa} - "Saying 'coi' is a way of greeting someone". Without the {cu} or {ku}, there is no bridi, and you have one big sumti composed of {le} + a tanru formed from {nu cusku lu coi li'u kei} and {te rinsa}. > Where the critical part is {cusku lu coi li'u} - does the > quoted text become x2 of "express"? Or it defaults to x1? It becomes x2 because it's after the brivla. If it were before the brivla ({lo nu lu coi li'u cusku cu te rinsa}), it would be x1 of {cusku}. Compare {klama le zarci} "goes to the market" and {le zarci cu klama} "the market goes". mu'o mi'e .filip.