From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Aug 22 09:00:11 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E7EiZ-0007Oe-Kc for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:00:11 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.200]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E7EiX-0007OU-4K for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:00:11 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so692178nzp for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:00:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NbPriYJh6kbLztMCrcjvliSpXf7ljuxKyrOPnnDY5ujGT0excM5i1LNACp2oPXUMwMbakl6dk8XM1uR08wmtfjtk1KqKsGKhO+UY7uziwi6b2bNeK6k/UBbptIFlxKBJKuN2T/P/dA73ukxmgQxsbEZ1oW/j8GD0ljketKPFgPg= Received: by 10.36.60.18 with SMTP id i18mr4263334nza; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.222.64 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d3df92a05082209005d20946c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:00:06 +0200 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: ...to say 'coi' In-Reply-To: <737b61f305082208432b723a45@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6947_5051927.1124726406804" References: <2d3df92a05082208073c6f585a@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f305082208432b723a45@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 1819 X-Approved-By: exitconsole@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------=_Part_6947_5051927.1124726406804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline >=20 > Something I wonder, though, is what happens in cases like this: {fe la > alis. cukta fa ti la lu,es. carol.}. Does the third sumti fit into the > third place of cukta, since the second place is already filled earlier > in the sentence? (Of course, to really do this you'd just do {se > cukta}, but I'm sure there are examples where this could be useful. Or > speakers that hate using conversion cmavo.) "{carol.}" is {kerol.}, actually. :) My humble opinion is, though it might sound silly, that it overwrites (?)= =20 the previous argument. Thus You could correct Your sentence by the second value getting to that=20 sumti place. Like "Tom... oh, no: actually Martin won the race!", for example, in which= =20 case You would hop back to x1 by putting a {fa}. It'd be logical, not? mi'e .xili,odor. ------=_Part_6947_5051927.1124726406804 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Something I wonder, though, is w= hat happens in cases like this: {fe la
alis. cukta fa ti la lu,es. carol= .}. Does the third sumti fit into the
third place of cukta, since the second place is already filled earlier<= br>in the sentence? (Of course, to really do this you'd just do {se
cukt= a}, but I'm sure there are examples where this could be useful. Or
speak= ers that hate using conversion cmavo.)
 
"{carol.}" is {kerol.}, actually. :)
My humble opinion is, though it might sound silly, that it overwrites = (?) the previous argument.
Thus You could correct Your sentence by the second value getting to th= at sumti place.
Like "Tom... oh, no: actually Martin won the race!", for exa= mple, in which case You would hop back to x1 by putting a {fa}.
It'd be logical, not?
 
mi'e .xili,odor.
------=_Part_6947_5051927.1124726406804--