From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Aug 27 02:51:41 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:51:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E8xLh-0004kJ-0B for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:51:41 -0700 Received: from mailgw6.gedas.de ([139.1.44.12]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E8xLe-0004kB-7e for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:51:40 -0700 Received: from mailgw6.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw6.gedas.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7R9pbev012776 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 11:51:37 +0200 Received: from blnsem08.de.gedas-grp (blnsem08.gedas.de [139.1.84.54]) by mailgw6.gedas.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7R9pboH012770 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 11:51:37 +0200 Received: by blnsem08.de.gedas-grp with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 11:51:36 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Newton, Philip" To: "'lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org'" Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: fanva lo nuzba Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 11:51:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 1886 X-Approved-By: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners la .komfo,amonan. cu cusku di'e > se cusku la petr bratn po lo briju po lo ralca'i po la sualbard I wonder whether it wouldn't have been more Lojbanic to use {be} rather than {po}... after all, gismu have more than one place for a reason; why not use it rather than using a vague connector such as {pe} or {po}. In this case, it could probably have been {la petr bratn po lo briju be lo ralca'i be la sualbard}. mu'o mi'e .filip.