From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Sep 03 02:25:57 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 03 Sep 2005 02:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EBUHc-0007AM-VX for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 02:25:57 -0700 Received: from mx18.yandex.ru ([213.180.200.18]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EBUHP-0007A3-BB for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 02:25:56 -0700 Received: from h125.keldysh.ru ([194.226.57.125]:48021 "EHLO [194.226.57.125]" smtp-auth: "deletesoftware" TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by mail.yandex.ru with ESMTP id S3375893AbVICJZf (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2005 13:25:35 +0400 X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at mx18.yandex.ru logged sender identity as: deletesoftware Message-ID: <4318967A.2030401@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 22:14:18 +0400 From: "Aleksej R. Serdyukov" Organization: Delete Software Limited User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: "no exception" References: <2d3df92a05090206511a5fe6a8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2d3df92a05090206511a5fe6a8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-archive-position: 1935 X-Approved-By: deletesoftware@yandex.ru X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: deletesoftware@yandex.ru Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners HeliodoR wrote: > aa(ab(ac(ad,ae),af),ag(ah,ai)) etc. > No exceptions. Totally. Crystal-clear, huh? Not at all to me. (Not to Er.. IMO, exceptions are rules, too, but they look so bad, they are only useful for a couple of things, and they break other, bigger rules...