From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Sep 17 08:01:42 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EGeCD-0001g5-Rp for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:01:41 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.206]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EGeC8-0001fw-DH for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:01:41 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s1so337813nze for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:01:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=N8+BKBQpr8rlf1hY499cHrcVg3NGMbD4MXmYG385MeUDk6vHPqxcnAx2CYMVSj+w3hBJZyV78ZwfFALK/YvWV0sCE1lOeJjkGZeEfKL3ch63mpRlqGSDpGuE5CZMxupxlwRuPn8V3Rd94YFL23Zgo/vlMDAC+nMasE8oJIbtTUs= Received: by 10.54.51.46 with SMTP id y46mr189836wry; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d1756050917080149da90ae@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 12:01:31 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Genders In-Reply-To: <5ccdc753050917074515f7baf4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <5ccdc753050917074515f7baf4@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 2111 X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 9/17/05, la cuncuxnas. wrote: > (and, also, > adding straight rafsi to names wouldn't be a bad way to do it, in my > opinion). Often names are created out of rafsi, but you can't count on them retaining their meaning. It's more like the name Brown having nothing to do with the colour brown. BTW, nan and nin are the rafsi for snanu (south) and cnino (new). Not all gismu have a CVC rafsi. mu'o mi'e xorxes