From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Sep 22 16:57:08 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EIaw7-0002zH-Rs for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:57:07 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.194]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EIavr-0002yo-06 for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:57:07 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s1so399253nze for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:56:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pVfgA/vabB0g70Qh9KYTJTYEMLn8DEa4TgphcsP0eL7MEdV1wZDEHu62XSOn4bg4kyC2aJDPFj9OG6bGXfwyTgP7JF9w8L4pT6DqDg7GlFXTDlD43bl8X2GOFMwmEsi3cL1z7fRgk3CgUtwXGx6VYpguofDrDYIURWu/IB21M0E= Received: by 10.54.32.16 with SMTP id f16mr60618wrf; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:56:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:56:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d1756050922165696079ce@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 20:56:45 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: gendered and gender-neutral language In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <200509190452.AAA18658@Sparkle.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 2265 X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 9/22/05, Robert Griffin wrote: > Coi rodoi > (which brings up the question, I used to see 'coi redoi', but now only see > 'coi rodo'. Which is correct?) {coi ro do} is correct, {coi ro doi} is ungrammatical. {coi} has to be followed by a sumti or a selbri, or just closed with the terminator {do'u}. ... > On the other hand, since lojban maintains NO grammatical or lexical > gender differences, excepting 'patfu' and 'mamta', And a very few others: bersa - tixnu bruna - mensi nanmu - ninmu nanla - nixli and of course: nakni - fetsi I believe those are all. mu'o mi'e xorxes