From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Oct 04 12:59:23 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 04 Oct 2005 12:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EMswd-0007PJ-GD
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 12:59:23 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.204])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EMswa-0007PB-Uw
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 12:59:23 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so310294wri
        for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 12:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=einhhVPu2p8k2qe7q+gZQBRb7PQ/URxCF857/zNIGHk7s1r0ZHlKwaqpcMFntqIwzkyJOfjgIKnolVW1A5AX29eeTJQEvIjZFdj23zYvWgTXbbfoAisnVOhehzIbCy7o3FZeFHXKn4DGgYvij34+AXfq9hUFfSe/vqdOB/gXqmw=
Received: by 10.54.142.14 with SMTP id p14mr513192wrd;
        Tue, 04 Oct 2005 12:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.142.3 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 12:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e6663d200510041259tdef84c4k4a58dfe34d559aab@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 15:59:19 -0400
From: Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Question
In-Reply-To: <20051004180933.GA18987@vicerveza.homeunix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <43426A2E.8010709@virgin.net>
	 <20051004180933.GA18987@vicerveza.homeunix.net>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
X-archive-position: 2366
X-Approved-By: matt.mattarn@gmail.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

On 10/4/05, Lluís Batlle i Rossell <viric@vicerveza.homeunix.net> wrote:
> I think I still remember ;)
> It's needed "le nu dunda"... and the closing particle for 'nu'. :)
>
> (is it? :)

If it would grab the whole rest of the sentence into the "nu"
abstraction, then you need the particle, which is "kei", to close off
the "nu" abstraction and prevent that confusion. But if not, it's
acceptable to leave out "kei".
-epkat