From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Oct 17 11:11:03 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ERZRu-0003z1-R5 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:11:02 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.201]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1ERZRs-0003yn-GG for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:11:02 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i13so524466wra for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:10:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=RtPLYOfyftozdBvXLxcZxzwvw7bgM3FGrTK/196iicEi7qqJnLoKi3amcIG+xjhHD3Tetk4Cefps1Bmmn3JYqfTeJvY53Hc04z4Z/T/FLFuLeIOwQ+ZPormrEW+s3BGeN3uG8Ws6qaf2XHeDha7ZjCbatC/UADN2kTbKqI0tXXU= Received: by 10.54.137.20 with SMTP id k20mr1946391wrd; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.65? ( [195.186.194.113]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 12sm3271469wrl.2005.10.17.11.10.54; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) In-Reply-To: References: <26506d300510170419p30f70d67o@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <193B5F2B-E72B-43B9-B5CB-D169FE9FC570@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Thomas White Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Question of logic? Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:10:51 +0200 To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 2400 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: winterwhite9257@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners .u'i.ua. Thank you for that. On Oct 17, 2005, at 06:22 PM, Christopher Zervic wrote: On 10/17/05, Thomas White wrote: > Isn't a precision of gait (x4) redundant since 'running' is in and of > itself a gait? > Pick up a Daily Racing Form and see how many ways a gait in a horse can be described: sprinting, driving, climbing, lugging... -- Christopher Zervic, Esq.